I. Outline of the Project
1. Background of the ProjectJICA assistance in Tuberculosis control in Nepal dates back in 1960's. Cooperation at the national level however was conceptualised in 1985 following the Nepal visit of Princess Chichibu. Comprehensive assistance at the national level was started in 1987 as Phase I project implemented from 1987 till 1994 with emphasis on capacity strengthening and establishing infrastructures including reorganisation of central office in NTC building. Encouraged by the success of the Phase I project, JICA initiated Phase II assistance to NTP started on 1994 with the aim of strengthening the National TB Programme (NTP) ultimately contributing to the promotion of public health and welfare in the kingdom of Nepal. 2. Project overviewJICA TB Control Project, Phase II emphasised on overall capacity strengthening of National TB Programme. The project rather than focusing on specific aspect of the TB had a broad and comprehensive approach so that all aspects of NTP are strengthened. Input in policy development, emphasising the training, logistic supply, recording and reporting, and supervision/monitoring system were major areas of intervention. a. Overall goalThe overall goal of the Project was to strengthen the activities of NTP through the primary health care structure and thus contribute to the promotion of public health and welfare in the Kingdom of Nepal b. Project Purpose
c. Outputs
Inputs (Japanese side)
Inputs (Nepalese side)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
II. Evaluation team
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
III. Results of Evaluation3-1 Summary of Evaluation Results(1). ImpactTable below indicates that there is a consistent rise in some of the success indicators for TB programme during the Phase II support period. NTP has been successfully expanded merely from 1.7% population coverage (1996) to now 94% (2002). Likewise the expansion is being supported by the increased government budget although that is not adequate to cover the total cost of NTP. TB Control programme in Nepal is considered to be one of the successful programmes by national and international reviewers. However, there is room for improvement particularly in the area of access and financing the drug cost. Currently 22 out of 75 districts still have one DOTS centre, and only 2 districts have more than 10 DOTS Centres. Further, no negative impact related to Phase II was reported or observed during the whole study period.
(2). SustainabilityInstitutional 3-2 Factors promoting sustainability and Impact:~on planning~
~on implemnentation process~
3-3 Factor inhibiting sustainability and impact:~on planning~After the recent organizational/policy change in the government, structural position, role and function of RTC in relation to regional directorate and NTC is not clear. As a result, RTC does not seem to be fully utilized as expected, considering its potential.But it was very difficult to predict this situation when planning. ~on implemnentation process~
3-4 Conclusions:The JICA inputs, along with other donors inputs have been instrumental in strengthening the NTP. The TB programme has been repositioned and upgraded with contribution from the JICA assistance. The commitments, space created, and technical and financial assistance to NTP have not only strengthened the overall NTP, but also have opened up the avenues of opportunity for many development partners to play a role in NTP. The quality TB service is being continued with expansion of programme throughout the country. municipalities, VDCs and private sectors are now collaborating with NTP. Although there is regular increase in national budget for NTP, the drug component is largely dependent on external assistance. 3-5 Recommendations:Despite decentralisation of the implementation of TB programme, the budget allocation pattern and decision-making indicates centralisation. Peripheral units are required to take many decisions that would promote the sustainability but they have little resources and mandate for this. Therefore decentralisation needs to be promoted, as appropriate. 3-6 Lesson learnedA national programme implemented through existing structures without creating parallel structure is likely to be absorbed in the system and continued even after the withdrawal of external assistance. JICA Phase II was the case in point here. NTC needs to gradually evolve as a Central Referral Unit while at the same time focusing on policy development, monitoring, resource mobilisation and research activities. Field implementation role should be gradually decentralised further so that peripheral units, including RTC can assume more responsibilities and the coverage and access is improved. NTC may seek donors' assistance in these areas. 3-7 Follow-upJICA has been executing ' Community Tuberculosis and Lung Health Project' following the two project. Under the CTLHP, JICA has been focusing on the urban DOTS programme and trying to strengthen the NTP more. In addition to that, JICA set the target wider to 'lung health' such as anti-smoking activities and ARI(Acute Respiratory Illness), using the experiences and approaches of decades' TB control projects. |