1. Outline of the Project
1-1 Background of the ProjectThe agriculture stands out, within the national development program, as one of the prioritary areas and efficient agricultural production is hereby mentioned, stressing out the establishment of agricultural infrastructures and the diversification of the production. The Ñeembucú Department is located south of Paraguay and 80% of the producers is made up of small producers with less than 20Ha in tenancy. This Department is located within a triangular zone made up by the joining of the Paraguay river, that runs across the country in north-south direction, and the Paraná river that runs across the country in east-west direction, and has been suffering damages due to the overflowing of these rivers. In particular, during the overflow that took place in 1983, it suffered a great deal of damage, such as the overflow of most of the farming lands, roads cuts, among other damages, and later, approximately half of the lands became overflowed, thus turning difficult the life standards of the small producers and affecting also their production. 2. Project Overview(1) Overall GoalTo improve the life standards of the small producers in the southern region of Pilar. (2) Project PurposeTo strenghten the technical and organizational capacity of the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock, and of the small producers of the project's zone, to achieve a continuous sustainable farming development through the improvement in the handling of drainage, soil impovement, improvement of the farming techniques, diversification of the exploitation modality, among others. (3) Outputs1. (Elaborate the drainage handling program): The counterpart learns the skills and techniques related to the elaboration of the drainage handling program, through the collection and analysis of data at the project's zone, and through the elaboration of the drainage handling program. 2. (Set up an infrastructures model for the drainage handling): The counterpart learns the suitable techniques, and its efficient exploitation method, for the planning, design and construction of infrastructures of drainage that may be built and maintained at communitary level through the participation of the producers, through the construction of drainage handling infrastructure and equipping of farming lands such as the demonstration parcels at the model zone. 3. (Create an maintenance system of the drainage channel through the participation of the benefitiaries): The counterpart learns the way to improve the techniques to increase the productivity at the projet's zone through the analysis of suitable items and variety, possibility of alternate items, diversificación of the farming system, improvement of the farming techniques, suitable techniques for soil improvement. 4 (Improve and strengthen the extension activities to introduce the diversified exploitation modalities and the improved techniques): The counterpart and the extensionists obtain the capacity to be able to spread, in a efficient and effective way, the improved techniques and the diversified exploitation modalities, through training and capacitation to extensionists, key producers, demonstration of the improved exploitation modalities at the model farms, orientation and establishment of producers organizations, information campaign, among others. (4) Imputs (Moment of the Evaluation)Japanese Side:
Paraguay side:
| ||||||||||||||||
2. Evaluation Team
| ||||||||||||||||
3. Result of Evaluation3-1 Summary of Evaluation ResultThe following score was scaled of one to five. (1) Impact (average 3.6 points)1) (Drainage channel and environment 3 points) 2) (Infrastructures, such as roads 3 points) 3) (Farming & Livestock Industry and Production Techniques 4 points) 4) (Organization System 4 points) 5) (Other items such as human resources training, among others 3.5 points) (2) Sustainability (Average 3.4 points)1) (Policy 4 points) 2) (Organization and System 3,5 points) 3) (Heavy Machinery, human resources 3,5 points) 4) (Environment 3,5 points) 5) (Production Techniques 3,5 points) 3-2 Factors that have promoted project(1) In regard to the plan's content
(2) In regard to the execution process
3-3 Problems and factors that were notorious(1) In regard to the plan's content
(2) In regard to the execution process
3-4 Conclusion(1) Impact:With the overflow of the farming lands produced by the great overflow of 1983, roads cuts occurred and many of the producers were forced to abandon their lands. However, with the creation of drainage channels, roads were constructed (that joins Pilar with Gral. Díaz) and lands were recovered, thanks to which the number of producers returning to their lands has increased. The drainage handling techniques that were transferred during the execution period of the project were learned by the counterpart staff. The fact that the 147.8 km long channel constructed during the project's period was extended in 88.7 km with the own help of the Paraguayan part, makes us think that "the drainage infrastructure handling techniques" were satisfactorily transferred. (2) Sustainability:The bottleneck for the promotion of the DERMASUR project is the lack of operational resources, however it continues with the works through the support of the FUDEÑE, which was created at the end period of the project, 10 Municipalities, the Government of the Ñeembucú Department as well as through the support of the zone's producers. 3-5 Recommendations
(2) Recommendations to the JICA
3-6 Lessons Learned1) Executing the consideration of the environmental impact at the beginning of the project, this proyect, which is facing a constant extension, may alleviate the negative impacts to the environment with a broad vision. 2) In order to promote "the participation of the inhabitants" after the end of the project, it is necessary that the project achieves results at short term and visible, such as the case of the social and economical improvement through the construction of the channel. 3) It is necessary to analyze the number and volume of the equipments to be supplied, considering the cost of maintenance after the end of the project. 4) In order to assure the sustainability through the "participation of the inhabitants" after the end of the project, it is necessary to incorporate from the beginning of the project to the large producers who count with a financial capacity (to solve costs), and not just to the small producers. 3-7 Subsequent assistance State1) During the H15 fiscal year, the spare parts for heavy machinery were supplied for the amount of US$50,000.00 as a project of subsequent assistance. (Executed in March of the H16 fiscal year). 2) In October of the past year, arrived the senior volunteer for heavy machinery for the workshop of the DERMASUR. (Dispatch period: October of the H15 fiscal year to October of the H16 fiscal year). |