1. Outline of the Project | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Country:China | Project title:Shanghai Modern Molding Technology Training Center Project | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue/Sector:Industry | Cooperation Scheme:Project-type Technical Cooperation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Division in Charge:Mining and Industrial Development Cooperation Department, Second Technical Cooperation Division | Total Cost: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period of Cooperation | 1 September 1991 – 31 August 1995 | Partner Country’s Implementing Organization:Shanghai Light Machinery Corporation, Shanghai Modern Molding Technology Training Center, Shanghai Second Light Machinery School | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Supporting Organization in Japan: Ministry of International Trade and Industry, Cast and Wrought Products Division | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related Cooperation: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1-1 Background of the ProjectChinese government set molding technology as one of the most important technology in the Fourth Science and Technology Production Plan. Shanghai, an old industrial city and an important base in the coastal area, has been promoting the joint ventures with foreign capital. In order to develop a strong base for the developing molding industry, Chinese government requested that Japan provide technical cooperation to train senior technicians in practical molding technology. 1-2 Project OverviewThe cooperation improves China's precision in molding production technology for plastics and trains instructors and technicians in the Shanghai Molding Technology Training Center (“the Center”). (1) Overall Goal (2) Project Purpose (3) Outputs (4) Inputs
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. Evaluation Team | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Members of Evaluation Team | Team Leader/General: Takashi Tanaka (JICA China Office, Deputy Managing Director) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period of Evaluation | 24 February 2002 – 9 March 2002 | Type of Evaluation:Ex-post Evaluation By Overseas Offices | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. Results of Evaluation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3-1 Summary of Evaluation Results(1) Impact (2) Sustainability 3-2 Factors that promoted realization of effects(1) Factors concerning Planning (2) Factors concerning the Implementation Process 3-3 Factors that impeded realization of effects(1) Factors concerning Planning (2) Factors concerning the Implementation Process 3-4 ConclusionThe Project has achieved its sustainability. Given that approximately 60 percent of the 300 to 400 annual graduated trainees are from Shanghai city, impact on a nationwide scale as set in the overall goal is not yet possible to assess. But the Chinese government's policy to accept trainees from the central-western region on a preferential basis gives the expectation of contribution to the achievement of the overall goal in the future. 3-5 Recommendations (specific measures, proposals and advice for this project)(1) To increase the number of trainees from the central-western region, the responsible agency should enable the Center to establish an annual plan by clarifying the role of the Center in terms of the assistance to improve the molding industry in the central-western area. (2) It is necessary to establish the human resources development plan for trainers in response to the change and needs of the society, which leads to sustainable development of the Center. 3-6 Lessons Learned(matters which are helpful to identification/creation, implementation and management control of other similar projects)(1) It is desirable to choose a city that has developed light industry (not only molding, but regions that have need for high level light industry skill) as a project site when creating similar projects. In this case, the training center could easily recruit students. In addition, the Center could improve its capability in ways consistent with local needs by receiving actual commissioned work from private companies in the surrounding areas. (2) Since the trainees from private companies usually try to apply the knowledge and the skill they learned at the training center soon after, the project’s relevance and the impact of the technical training for private companies can be ascertained in a comparatively short period of time. On the other hand, as training centers are not under the formal education system, they must advertise and gather trainees independently. Until accomplishments of the Center are recognized, the number of applicants can be unstable. By creating a mutually complementary system through affiliations with professional schools that are human sources to companies, this particular project can provide an example of technology training for private companies. (3) It is easy for "a training center" to establish a financial base with revenue from the trainees' course fees. This means; however, the financial capacity of a training center is limited by the number of trainees, and it influences whether it may be profitable or not. In case the primary target is company technician, it is difficult to train many trainees at one time. But it is possible to maintain stable finances such as this project that combines with professional schools. (4) To ensure sustainability after the project completion, it is necessary to maintain the Japanese support system including information service as long as possible. (5) It is essential to establish a monitoring system of the project implementation in order to reflect the review of goals and targets resultant from changes of external factors during the project implementation to the terminal and the ex-post evaluation. 3-7 Follow-up SituationA request for in-country training has been submitted to train personnel in the central-western area. Currently, the Japanese side is considering future courses of action. |